A Bolder Look To The Mona Lisa & The Starry Night




THE MONA LISA by LEONARDO da VINCI


Despite the admiration of Leonardo da Vinci as a scientist, academic, and inventor, his fame rests on his achievements as the painter of Renaissance masterpieces. These paintings are famous for a variety of qualities that have been much imitated by students and discussed at great length by connoisseurs and critics.

Among the qualities that make Leonardo's work unique are the innovative techniques that he used in laying on the paint, his detailed knowledge of anatomy, his innovative use of the human form in figurative composition, the sfumato smoking technique, and his use of the subtle gradation of tone. All these qualities come together in his most famous painted masterpiece, the Mona Lisa.

Among the works created by Leonardo in the sixteenth century is the small portrait known as the Mona Lisa, or La Gioconda, "the laughing one" . In the present era it is arguably the most famous painting in the world. Its fame rests, in particular, on the elusive smile on the woman's face—its mysterious quality brought about perhaps by the fact that the artist has subtly shadowed the corners of the mouth and eyes so that the exact nature of the smile cannot be determined. The shadowy quality for which the work is renowned came to be called "sfumato," or the application of subtle layers of translucent paint so that there is no visible transition between colors, tones, and often objects. Other characteristics found in this work are the unadorned dress, in which the eyes and hands have no competition from other details; the dramatic landscape background, in which the world seems to be in a state of flux; the subdued coloring; and the extremely smooth nature of the painterly technique, employing oils, but applied much like tempera and blended on the surface so that the brushstrokes are indistinguishable.

A typical example of Leonardo's style of painting is the Mona Lisa with its perspective and "turnings". We are going to illustrate Leonardo's diverse painting style. This style is something that we today regard as a science, as opposed to that of many of his peers and modern painters. We will focus on and discuss the landscape behind the Mona Lisa.

Much is written about the landscape and its two different perspectives. The landscape is painted to the left and to the right, behind Mona Lisa and in two different levels. The two different levels have always been viewed at from directly in front of the painting. This was one of the mistakes that we will present in this conclusion. We will also refer to Leonardo's theory about "turnings" his famous thesis that he prepared for publication, where he describes a method for capturing human movements on the canvas.

In the Mona Lisa he experimented with the landscape. The two different parts of the landscape are very often seen from the perspective of two separate levels, the higher landscape and the lower landscape. The two perspectives have an active part to the completeness of the painting, both on the lefthand- and righthand- sides of the landscape, behind Mona Lisa. This was an experiment that Leonardo painted to bring the landscape in line with Mona Lisa . This picture is yet another example of Leonardo's scientific experiments and thoughts. If we all, spectators and analysts, try to contemplate Leonardo's paintings in his own way, as described in Codex Madrid 1 and 2, then we will realise that the landscape and the figures are in accordance with one another.

Writings about Leonardo's fantasy landscape have nothing to do with the one in the Mona Lisa. In general, he uses the landscape to give depth, perspective, and flexible movement. As a result of this, many people think he painted a fantasy landscape in the Mona Lisa where both roads and bridges are painted below two lakes. We cannot see any water under the bridge but it's not so unusual to build a bridge over a road or a waterway where water will only rarely pass.

On closer examination of the painting and its landscape it can be seen that the time of year is towards the end of summer when lakes and watercourse are almost dry. The landscape behind Mona Lisa is the Alps. One can determine the time of year due to the fact that no snow is seen and by studying the plantlife. This typifies all of Leonardo's paintings. The Mona Lisa also has the special light of dawn, which occurs at the end of summer. He loved this light and used it in all his paintings. When he painted the alpine landscape he had to compromise and lower the artistic level to a more fantastical landscape, in exchange for "turnings". This is a reason for why many people misinterpret Leonardo. The landscape was made unrealistic to give more power and movement to the Mona Lisa.

Now the question: who was Mona Lisa? Many link the painting "La Gioconda" to the Mona Lisa. It is possible the portrait is of the wealthy shopkeeper, Francesco del Gioconda's mistress, entitled "La Gioconda", meaning Mona Lisa. What is the destiny of this painting? Has it been lost? We do not dispute the fact that Leonardo made this painting, but we do not believe it has any connections to the Mona Lisa that can be found in the Louvre. This becomes apparent on closer examination.

The Mona Lisa that we all know so well is without any doubt the mother of Leonardo - the woman he praised so highly. Vasari described a painting by Leonardo, which was an order from the shopkeeper del Giocondo to portray his young mistress "Lisa di Antonio Maria di Noldo Gherardini". Vasari described the features of a young and beautiful woman - her eyebrows, eyelashes, and skin. In the Mona Lisa, which we believe to be Leonardo´s mother, the figure has neither eyebrows nor eyelashes. Her eyes look sad and her smile a bit scornful - not the expression of a young woman. Those who know Leonardo´s relationship with his mother better understand the expression in the painting. Leonardo had few meetings with Catharina, his biological mother, during his youth but still he paid for her an expensive funeral. She felt alienated from his upbringing but still they had a strong bond.

There is also a nude painting of an expressionless and unrealistic Mona Lisa - the painter of which is unknown. Some have tried to ascribe this to the Leonardo school, but should Leonardo paint his mother naked? It is known through writings that Leonardo always took the Mona Lisa with him on his travels.

By way of conclusion we will talk a little about the French King Frans I and his welcoming of Leonardo at the royal court. The French King built Leonardo a small castle nearby his own where he could get the attention and treatment he required during his last years of illness. This explains why the Mona Lisa is still in France and in the Louvre. The King highly respected and admired Leonardo and realised his greatness and talent. He felt honoured to be in the presence of Leonardo. The Mona Lisa became an admired picture, which was always dear to them - the most important picture for them both.

Returning to those who believe the Mona Lisa to be "La Gioconda" - should really the French King have such high regud for a painting of Francesco del Gioconda's mistress? Is it not more likely that "our mother" as both the King and Leonardo called the painting is portraying Lionardos mother? This painting was part of their souls and it is almost absurd to relate it to "La Gioconda". Would Leonardo pay so much attention to a painting of a shopkeeper's mistress during the last years of his life? This sounds absurd, both from human and physcological aspects.


STARRY NIGHT by VINCENT VAN GOGH

Van Gogh painted this piece in 1889 while he was in Saint Rémy seeking treatment in a mental asylum. Interestingly enough, he painted this piece from his memory and it was supposed to have been based on a constellation arrangement he had seen earlier on in the night sky of Provence. Starry Night is perhaps one of his most famous and yet most elusive works. 

The first thing that I noticed was the overwhelming night sky, which takes up most of the background. Its swirling, flowing lines appear to be swishing across the background in this gentle, wavy motion and seem to be merging at the centre to form this spiral-like formation. Eleven fiery yellow stars that look like huge fireballs illuminate this whole piece and contrast with the cool blue, fluid night sky that takes on an amazing variety of shades of blue and grey. There is also the crescent moon at the top right hand corner that radiates a more orange, brighter light from the rest of the stars. The view of the night sky and village is partially blocked by this huge cypress bush in the foreground. It has this writhing quality to it and its black green colouring stands out to the rest of the relatively pastel piece. The houses are tiny and inconspicuously painted in the bottom right corner of the painting and blend in quite well with the forest and mountains. The architecture of the village is quaint and simple and no light illuminates the village, giving the impression that everyone there is probably asleep. In general, his brush strokes are heavy and thick and have this insistent, hectic rhythm to it. As a result, this painting has an illusion of constantly being in motion. 

The fact that he had painted this from his mental image may have contributed to this piece having such a strong sense of great mental dislocation and emotional intensity. One almost feels as if he was hardly able to contain his feelings and that all his angst and passion seem to have spilled onto this piece. The moon and stars seem so huge that we feel that the sky is about to fall in on us. The cypress bush, a usually inconspicuous and solemn funeral plant seems almost sinister as it confronts us right smack in front of the picture. It's as if Van Gogh was creating his own kind of reality and chose to emphasise objects he felt were important to him even though this resulted in perspectives being distorted. 

The painting seems to be seething with life as the fluid brushstrokes give the impression of movement. In particular, it's the night sky that seems to be the life force of this piece with its bursting dynamism. It seems as if galaxies are in motion and that the stars would plunge into the sleepy town at any moment. The stars and the sky seem to possess such great emotional intensity with its variety of strokes and colours all merging together to form a spiral-like mist in the centre. 

The cypress, on the other hand, seems to somewhat dampen the dazzling effect of the night sky with its writhing, dark leaves sprawling up on the left side of the picture. It has this snaky form to it and seems totally uncharacteristic with the rest of the painting. It disturbs the whole equilibrium to what had could have been a magical depiction of a starry night. Dondis states that the human eye usually favours the lower left area of any visual field and it seems that Van Gogh had quite deliberately painted the cypress bush in such a prominent position. A possible interpretation could be that the bush was a representation of the inner anguish he was going through at that time. The turmoil he was going through might have been writhing out the intensity he had for life. 

The little houses, on the other hand, seem pretty quiet. All the lights are out and everybody's asleep, unaware of the night sky that's bursting with life and the cypress bush writhing in front of them. This depicts some sort of alienation and ignorance. I feel that the sleepy village represents the rest of the world, unaware of whatever raging passions and agony Van Gogh was going through at that moment. Perhaps this is why the houses seem to appear so far away even though they are actually more or less in the foreground. 

My interpretation of Starry Night is just one of the many and it remains very much an elusive work to art critics and students alike. Because nobody really knows Van Gogh's intention of painting this piece, everybody seems to be using different codes to decipher what Van Gogh was trying to bring across. One critic thought of this as a religious piece depicting a story from the Bible. In the book of Genesis, Joseph has a dream of eleven stars, the sun and moon (the moon and sun appear to be merged together here) that symbolised his brothers and parents bowing down to him. Another academic thought this painting to be a convergence of historical forces as it was during this time when there was a public fascination with astronomy and astrology with people like Jules Verne writing about travelling to the moon. For me, I've always had this sentimental idea of him as this tragic, angst-filled artist who actually wanted to do so much for humanity (he was once an evangelist) but was constantly being rejected by society. This painting communicated to me this love he had for Gods beautiful creations, and yet, there is this unmistakable sense of loneliness as if no one really saw the world as he saw it. 

Of course, to understand his style of painting in Starry Night a little better, we have to look at the big picture. Vincent Van Gogh was one of the great postimpressionist artists along the likes of Cézanne and Gauguin. Postimpressionism was basically a reaction against impressionism, which ascribed to the belief that art should accurately reflect reality with natural colour and lighting. Postimpressionists believed that art is not meant to imitate form, but to create form. This means that artists of this period took a subjective view of the visual world and painted their world according to their own artistic perceptions. As Van Gogh himself said, "We may succeed in creating a more exciting and comforting nature than we can discern with a single glimpse of reality." This is why postimpressionist artists have no fixed style -- their works reflected their own unique personalities and perceptions. In Van Gogh's case, his works seemed to reflect a great emotional intensity, like that seen in Starry Night. He told his brother Theo that instead of using colours realistically, he would rather use them "more arbitrarily in order to express myself more forcibly". In particular, he liked to paint landscapes that reflected his own emotions and soul. In a way, there is this sense of liberation as he departed from the traditional artistic boundaries. Starry Night is the embodiment of Van Gogh's unique style and expression. Indeed, pieces such as these have played a major influence on modern art.

0 comments: